|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- an incorrect diagnosis
- a certain lack of awareness by general
practitioners or specialists
on this type of therapy
- our decision to treat similar pathologies with less expensive and more
available therapies
|
|
4
|
- We have performed a systematic review of our clinical cases evaluated
over a one-year period
- We reported all referrals
in our ESWT out-patient service to the Azienda
Ospedaliera of Lodi
throughout 2007
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Soft tissue pathologies make up more than 90% of ESWT requests
- Shoulder tendinopathy is the most frequent complaint, followed by
plantar fasciitis and elbow lateral epicondylitis
- The most frequent incorrect referrals are vascular pathology,
arthropathy, neuropathy and tendon lesions
|
|
15
|
- The specialist who perfoms ESWT is responsible
for this treatment.
- As a result, in order avoid possible legal
- complications, physicians who perform
- ESWT should be extremely careful
about
- incorrect diagnosis
- increase of costs
- lack of results
- discrediting the ESWT
|
|
16
|
- We noted that ESWT was all too often proposed as initial treatment
(33,7%) and, in a large number
of cases,we found discrepancies with the real clinical situation of the patients
- ESWT was used on far fewer cases than initially brought to our attention
- In the end only half of the examined patients (51,4%) were treated with
ESWT
|
|
17
|
- We intend to organise awareness-raising activities among GPs and
specialists
- We wish to work in agreement to ISMST and National
Societies on clinical indications
- to promote
- strict guidelines regarding the
treatment
- of various pathologies
- evaluation and qualification
criteria
- for operators
|
|
18
|
|